Much to my
displeasure, Ryder Cup events are over until the fall of 2016. Unless you count
the PGA of America announcing their 2016 captain at the end of the year, but
that isn’t exactly nail biting. It was a great tournament, and there’s actually
a lot to take away from it.
If any of you
adjusted your sleeping schedule to watch this epic weekend, I have the upmost
respect for you. Or you could have been like me and slept for a total of 10
hours all weekend. Either way if you watched the Ryder Cup live you’re doing
things right, and if you didn’t then you missed out.
I’d like to
point out that I nailed it directly on the head by predicting a final score of
16.5-11.5 (Here’s my pre-Ryder
Cup column for proof). I was slightly off on my prediction of the singles
matches, but I’ll excuse myself and toot my own horn.
The Americans
actually exceeded expectations in many ways. They kept it close on day 1, gave
themselves a fighting chance, and actually outscored Europe in the fourball
matches. The American rookies shined brightly amidst the dimmed veterans, which
is a great sign for years to come.
Europe on the
other hand played amazing golf all weekend, whether it was a rookie or veteran.
They truly deserved the win, and Paul McGinley needs to be credited with an
excellent weekend as team captain.
Before I get
into my analysis of the tournament here’s a quick view of how each golfer performed.
·
= rookie.
·
Records are written out “win-loss-tie”
·
(How
many strokes they won/lost by & How
many holes were left when the match ended)
·
1UP = the player/pairing won by one hole
·
1DN = the player/pairing lost by one hole
·
Bottom Row signifies how many points the
team earned in each style of match.
TEAM USA
Player
|
Fourball
|
Foursome
|
Singles
|
Jordan Spieth*
|
2-0-0
(5&4, 5&3)
|
Halved
|
Lost 2&1
|
Patrick Reed*
|
2-0-0
(5&4, 5&3)
|
Halved
|
Won 1UP
|
Rickie Fowler
|
Halved Twice
|
0-1-1
(5&4)
|
Lost 5&4
|
Hunter Mahan
|
1-0-0
(4&3)
|
0-2-0
(2&1, 3&2)
|
Halved
|
Phil Mickelson
|
1-0-0 (1UP)
|
0-1-0
(3&2)
|
Won 3&1
|
Bubba Watson
|
0-2-0
(5&4, 3&2)
|
0-0-0
|
Lost 4&2
|
Matt Kuchar
|
0-1-0
(3&2)
|
0-2-0 (2DN,
2&1)
|
Won 4&3
|
Jim Furyk
|
1-0-0
(4&3)
|
0-2-0 (2DN,
3&2)
|
Lost 1DN
|
Webb Simpson
|
0-1-0
(5&4)
|
0-0-0
|
Halved
|
Keegan Bradley
|
1-0-0 (1UP)
|
0-1-0
(3&2)
|
Lost 4&3
|
Jimmy Walker*
|
Halved Twice
|
0-1-1
(5&4)
|
Won 3&2
|
Zach Johnson
|
0-0-0
|
0-2-0
(2&1, 2&1)
|
Halved
|
Total=11.5
|
5
|
1
|
5.5
|
TEAM EUROPE
Player
|
Fourball
|
Foursome
|
Singles
|
Graeme
McDowell
|
0-0-0
|
2-0-0
(3&2, 5&4)
|
Won 2&1
|
Henrik Stenson
|
2-0-0
(5&4, 3&2)
|
1-0-0
(2&1)
|
Lost 1DN
|
Rory McIlroy
|
0-1-1 (Lost
1DN)
|
1-0-1
(3&2, Halved)
|
Won 5&4
|
Justin Rose
|
2-0-0
(5&4, 3&2)
|
1-0-1
(2&1, Halved)
|
Halved
|
Stephen
Gallacher*
|
0-1-0
(5&4)
|
0-0-0
|
Lost 3&1
|
Martin Kaymer
|
0-1-1
(5&3, Halved)
|
Halved
|
Won 4&2
|
Thomas Bjorn
|
0-1-1
(5&3, Halved)
|
0-0-0
|
Lost 4&3
|
Sergio Garcia
|
0-1-0 (Lost
1DN)
|
1-0-1
(3&2, Halved)
|
Won 1UP
|
Ian Poulter
|
0-1-1
(5&4, Halved)
|
0-0-0
|
Halved
|
Jamie
Donaldson*
|
0-1-0
(4&3)
|
2-0-0 (Won
2UP, 2&1)
|
Won 4&3
|
Lee Westwood
|
0-1-0
(4&3)
|
2-0-0 (Won
2UP, 2&1)
|
Lost 3&2
|
Victor
Dubuisson*
|
0-0-0
|
2-0-0
(3&2, 5&4)
|
Halved
|
Total=16.5
|
3
|
7
|
6.5
|
As you can see
in the tables above, there were impressive rookies for both sides. When I woke
up at 2 o’clock on Friday morning and saw the fourball matchups, I felt good. I
sent out a tweet saying that I loved the Spieth and Reed pairing, and they
didn’t let me down. I was slightly concerned since they were up against Ian
Poulter, but Gallacher held Poulter down a bit. Reed and Spieth combined to
earn the US 6 points, which is quite the feat. Not only that, but they were the
leading point-getters for team USA. Furthermore,
Reed’s 3.5 points were second in the entire field to Justin Rose’s 4. The rest
of the rookies played well too. With the exception of Stephen Gallacher,
Dubuisson, Donaldson and Walker earned upwards of 2 points a piece (Gallacher
earned 0).
As I predicted,
Furyk and the other veterans struggled for Team USA, and Europe’s veterans (Stenson,
Kaymer, McIlroy, Garcia, etc.) had solid tournaments. The only American vet
that played well was Phil Mickelson.
One thing that I
failed to mention in my preview was the pairing of Mickelson and Keegan
Bradley. They were 3-0 together entering the tournament, and won their first
match on Friday. They were in position to win their second match of the day but
conceded the lead to Dubuisson and McDowell. They’re now 4-1 as a couple, and
as long as they both make the squad they’ll continue playing together.
The togetherness
of the European team is the most explicit contrasting quality between the two
squads, and the captains have a lot to do with that. The Europeans captain
selection is a lot more methodical than that of the American team. Each
European captain has to have been a vice captain at one point, so they already
know the ropes. They value captainship, and it shows.
In addition to
that, there are a lot of European players that have developed chemistry with
each other. They’ve played as partners in the past, and it gave them a very
noticeable edge in the foursome matches. Rose and Stenson are a lethal pairing,
along with McIlroy and Garcia. Europe knows they have that advantage and they
will continue to use that strategy until it fails to work. Aside from Mickelson
and Bradley, there isn’t any consistent pairing amongst any of the players. I
have a feeling Reed and Spieth will be paired together for the 2016 Ryder Cup,
but as of right now there isn’t a lot of American chemistry.
Here’s another
downside to team USA. According to the American players, there wasn’t a lot of
communication with captain Tom Watson. In an interview shortly after the
conclusion of the Ryder Cup, it was said that they weren’t involved with any of
the decisions, which could be a reason for the failures that USA experienced in
the foursome matches.
Prior to the
Ryder Cup, I didn’t have any issues with Watson as the captain. While watching
the Ryder Cup though, he had me in a tizzy. Why did Bubba Watson play in both
matches on Friday? He looked absolutely terrible in the morning fourball, and
had no business playing another 18 holes. Instead Watson should have played
Spieth and Reed, who were the clear-cut best option for his team all weekend. Following
up with the lineup issues, I don’t agree with his decision to play Phil in both
Friday matches. He’s too old for that, and he had to sit out all day Saturday.
Phil should’ve played 18 a day; nothing more, nothing less. Not having Phil
available on Saturday was a huge setback, and it showed.
Then came the
singles matches… Leading off with Spieth was not a good idea. Nor was sending
out Reed after him, and Fowler after Reed, and then Mahan after Mickelson.
European captain Paul McGinley put his veterans out first because he wanted to
seal the deal early. I would have led off with Kuchar or Furyk. The Americans
were outmatched no matter what in head-to-head, and sending out youngsters
first only dug ourselves into a hole.
I know Reed won
his match, and Spieth should have, but he collapsed. He was up 3 at the turn,
and McDowell bided his time before storming back to take 5 out of the next 6
holes. When Spieth was struggling to close out the match, Watson was nowhere to
be found. What Jordan needed was a veteran presence to calm him down and help
him out. Instead, he was left out to dry. It was sad to watch the collected
Graeme McDowell win hole after hole against the inexperienced Spieth. I blame
Watson for that opening singles loss, which was so crucial to the rest of the
day.
Following that
up, Hunter Mahan was in a difficult situation on the eighteenth hole. He was
just shy of the green on the right-hand side, and the pin was up. He had two
options; he could have either take a flop shot to try and land it on the back
side of the pin, or he could have bumped it on to the top of the slope and let
it coast down towards the hole. Had he taken the second option, he would have
easily halved the hole (at worst) and won the match. Instead he elected to try
and go for gold, and he lost the hole.
Say America won
those two matches, they would have earned an additional 1.5 points while Europe
would have lost 1.5 points. A 3-point swing at the beginning of Ryder Cup
Sunday would have been pivotal to the outcome of the match, as the score would
have been 11-10 after the first 5 singles matches (opposed to 12.5-8.5).
Opposed to
Watson’s poor captainship, McGinley led his team to a well-earned victory. The
US will be better prepared and equipped to regain the trophy in 2016, but
Europe was simply too good this year. As you can see with Spieth, Reed and
Horschel, the Americans have a batch of rising stars in the game of golf.
The 2014-2015
PGA Season kicks off this Thursday with the Frys.com Open.
No comments:
Post a Comment